It is a long way since xchroot v2.5.3. Last year I had to stop development because the secret services did not allow me to continue. I could assign a variable on one line and it did not have the assigned value on the next line - and that offline. Luckily today I did not have any problems with xchroot. However developing a̅tea remains problematic and at least partially inhibited. Far worse there is no way for me to continue the development of my DualSat SAT-solver. Publishing the normal news messages here at the rss newsletter has also become increasingly difficult. Meanwhile I need to write the vast majority of messages offline. A few have been written on paper and with paperback dictionaries only. Nonetheless it is a huge alleviation to view suggestions of translate.google.com for Spanish and Portuguese which I could mostly still do with my tablet. Short before the COP26 the Firefox, Google Chrome and Falkon browsers have been disabled on my online machine in order to threaten me. I am currently using Epiphany and Midori. I had already feared that the overwhelming majority of the web would remain unreachable for me as I initially did not know any alternative graphical browser with Javascript.
new features: escape from a chroot environment into the original root if not disabled, better desktop shortcut creation for chroot programs, many many bugfixes including mount mirroring: Since v2.5 it can automatically mount directories f.i. under /media directly into the chroot. View the first lines of the xchroot executable with less or a text editor to see the full changelog.
Comment expliquer la croyance en la nature, en Dieu ou en la définissabilité formelle de notre monde? Quelles sont les corrélations? Un article inspiré de la propre expérience mystique de l'auteur - ce qui maintient notre monde au plus profond de lui-même.
Aunque la compensación de carbono (carbon offsetting) podría ayudar de hecho a reducir las emisiones con algunos proyectos, su objetivo principal es, sin lugar de dudas, el lavado verde. Por eso el artículo 6 se ha puesto en práctica tan apresuradamente en la COP26. Ni las florestas están protegidas por este mecanismo, ni su existencia ahorra ningún gas de efecto invernadero que no se ahorraría de cualquier manera mientras se permite que las emisiones contúen. JPMorgan y UBS, ambos miembros del Global Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), (net ~ neto/ compensación) son algunos de los peores financiadores de la exploración de petróleo y gas en el Amazonas. El crudo amazónico está provocando derrames de petróleo, enveneando el agua y además poniendo en riesgo la supervivencia de las tribus Amazónicas por invasores y nuevas carreteras que causan una deforestación mayor.
Con respecto a la nueva PAC (Politica Agricola Común) es decepcionante que las instituciones de la UE no apliquen el Green Deal en práctica bien. Los estados miembros solo pueden actuar por su propria cuenta, como Alemania que desea abolir el Glifosfato, mientras que pueda volver admitido a nivel de la UE. Sin embargo para cumplir con los objetivos de protección climática todos los estados miembros deberían seguir, no solo unos individuales.
Embora a compensação de carbono (carbon offsetting) possa de fato ajudar a reduzir as emissões com alguns projetos, seu objetivo principal é inegavelmente o lavado verde. É por isso que o artigo 6 foi colocado em prática tão apressadamente na COP26. Nem as florestas são protegidas por esse mecanismo, nem sua existência salva gases de efeito estufa que não seriam salvos de qualquer modo enquanto as emissões são permitidos a continuar. JPMorgan e UBS, ambos membros do Global Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), (net ~ líquido/ compensação) são alguns dos piores financiadores da exploração de petróleo e gás na Amazônia. O óleo da Amazônia está causando derramentos devastadores enveneando a água e além disso, colocando a sobrevivência das tribos amazônicas em risco por invasores e novas estradas que incentivam o desmatamento.
Relativamente à nova PAC (Política Agrícola Comum) é decepcionante que as instituções da UE não imponham a aplicação do Green Deal bastante. Os estados membros só podem agir por conta própria, como a Alemanha, que deseja abolir o Glifosfato, embora possa ser reaprovado no nível da UE. Para cumprir as metas de proteção do clima, todos os estados membros teriam de seguir, não apenas alguns individualmente.
Although carbon offsetting could in deed help to reduce emissions on a short term with some projects, its primary purpose is undeniably greenwashing. That is why article 6 has been put into practice so hastily at the COP26. Neither are forests protected by this mechanism nor does their existence save any GHGs (greenhouse gases) that would not be saved any way while emissions are allowed to continue. JPMorgan and UBS, both members of the Global Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ) are some of the worst financiers of oil and gas in the Amazon rainforest. Amazon crude is causing wreaking oil spills, poisoning water and additionally putting the survival of Amazonian tribes at risk by invaders and new streets which encourage further deforestation.
Concerning the new CAP it is disappointing that EU institutions do not enforce putting the Green Deal into practice. Member states can only act on their own like Germany desiring to abolish Glyphosate while it could be re-approved on EU level. However in order to meet the climate protection goals all member states would need to follow, not just a few individual ones.
